As noted no evidence comes forth for any healings. Hume is ever right. Induction,not eye-witness testimony rules.However, were there evidence then Hume would be wrong. So far the canons of reason find none.
As noted no evidence comes forth for any healings. Hume is ever right. Induction,not eye-witness testimony rules.However, were there evidence then Hume would be wrong. So far the canons of reason find none.
ReplyDelete