Sunday, November 11, 2012

Miracles-never! Pt.I

        Hume makes no a priori case  or argues in  a circle against miracles but instead portrays how people  fool themselves into believing in them.
 People want to believe. People discount  any facts against their beliefs.
 Was there any follow-up of the alleged healing? Did the person actually have that purported malady? Did trickery ensue?
        Healers can find people with  enough sight to see their fingers so that they claim to heal the m but put forth their fingers right in front of the  blind who see what they already could see, and thus  no miracle happened!
        Some people think that healers have healed them but die  shortly thereafter.
         Did the person have that particular malady? Was she misdiagnosed or misunderstood the doctor?
        The Vatican contemns itself with  its fraudulent claims of miracles ,based on the  uncredible reports of its faith-based experts! Skeptics ever find no such miracleS. Mother Dearest Teresa  does no   miracles but the credulous Vatican  prattles otherwise. And she was in reality a vile person as Christopher Hitchens  proclaims!
          What is the  reason for Marian apparitions that the Vatican at times  so relishes? None mean anything! Imaginative children  made up the  Fatima and the Medjugorje  apparitions.








          Why would the Deity make such  when He did nothing for the victims of the Holocaust? What a perverted contrast!
           Why the need for the bleeding statues? Again, we skeptics find natural causes.
          The Vatican accedes to evolution but still pushes for ensoulment? When did that miracle happened in  our evolution/ In the homo habilis?
               That is  obscurantism for which it ever loves.
           Never do  lovers of miracles give evidence for even just one miracle! They ever give  misinterpretations as is their wont  in presenting evidence anyway!
               

No comments:

Post a Comment