The Kalam Cosmological Argument: Part 1 (William Lane Craig) | That Religious Studies Website
What is your take on that argument? I've provided and will provide more evidence why it fails.
Do you agree with Rosa Rubicondior?
WLC fails to provide real evidence but instead misinterpretation and misrepresentation of scientific evidence. He fails to overcome the differences betwixt finite and finite mathematics about the supposed contradictions, which are only red herrings. He emits farragoes of sophisticated, solecistic sophistry.
Read any matter that affirms his arguments and come back here to give your take.
Study all the argument there and post here what you think about the argument.
ReplyDeleteLord Griggs