Yes to Carneades and Hume; no to Meyer

      Carneades' atelic argument that all teleological arguments fail, notes that Meyer begs the question in assuming directed outcomes.
      The author of those two articles there also refutes the cosmological and ontological arguments.He thereby updates Hume.
       Science itself defeats theism  as Lamberth's teleonomic argument argues that as science finds no supernatural intent behind natural phenomena, to postulate divine intent then contradicts rather  than complements science. Thus, theism is no more than reduced animism per Lamberth's reduced animism argument , and thus as superstitious as full animism with its many spirits or polytheism with its many gods.
       The supposed intelligence thus affirms animism.
       Theistic evolution is  just an oxymoronic obfuscation.